| |
A method to calculate bottom subsidence
for restoring eustasy sea-level changes*
Liao
Tai Ping1,Wu
Ya Sheng2
1.Chongqing University of Science and
Technology, Chongqing 400042, China
ltp57@yeah.net
2.Institute
of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029
wys@mail.igcas.ac.cn
Abstract
To exclude
the basin subsidence caused by sediment loading is a critical step in
restoring the magnitude of ancient eustatic changes. Since the basin
subsidence is caused by the weight of the deposits, the magnitude of the
subsidence should be in proportion to the weight of the deposits, i.e.,
the original thickness of the deposits. To several stratigraphic
sections under the same tectonic settings, the ratio of the difference
in the original thickness of any two sections to the difference in their
subsidence magnitudes should be a constant, which can be called
sediment-loading subsidence coefficient and can be easily calculated.
Then, the basin subsidence of a section can be obtained via multiplying
the original thickness of the section with the sediment-loading
subsidence coefficient.
Keywords:
eustatic sea-level change;
sediment loading subsidence;
sea-level change
1. Introduction
To restore ancient eustatic
change amplitudes and find the pattern of Phanerozoic eustatic changes
is the basis for predicting future eustatic changes. A key step in
restoring ancient eustatic change is to recognize and exclude the
magnitude of basin subsidence caused by sediment loading and the
vertical tectonic motion distances of the basin basement. Generally,
restoring ancient eustatic change amplitudes include two steps. Firstly,
relative sea-level change amplitudes are to be calculated. After that,
as the second steps, the basin subsidence and vertical tectonic motion
distances are to be recognized and excluded, so that the relative
sea-level change amplitude are converted to eustatic change amplitude.
Many methods have been
developed to determine relative sea-level change amplitude (Fischer,
1964; Harris et al., 1984; Seiglie and Moussa, 1984; Weimer, 1984; Cisne
et al., 1984; Cisne and Gildner, 1988; Hallam, 1978; Goldstein and
Franseen, 1995), such as those of Hallam, Cisne et al. But no effective
methods have been proposed to determine basin subsidence. A formula to
calculate basin subsidence is
S = Hw rw/rm + Ts rs/rm (1)
Here S, rw, rm, Hw, rs, Ts
means bottom subsidence amplitude, density of water, density of mantle,
sea-level change height, density of deposits, original thickness of
deposits, respectively (Burton et al., 1987; Rowan et al., 1996). This
formula means that the weight of the deposits make the mantle under the
earth crust to move aside and the weight of the mantle moved aside is
equal to the weight of the deposits on the basinal bottom. The basis of
the formula is isostasy, which can be easily understood from Archimedes’
formula to calculate buoyancy. According to the formula (1), 10 m thick
deposits will cause 6.7 m high subsidence of the basinal bottom. Such a
magnitude of subsidence seems to be too large to be credible and
isostasy is not always true. So this formula has not been generally
accepted for determining basin subsidence. Up to now, there are no
effective methods to determine ancient basin subsidence and determining
of ancient eustatic change amplitudes is generally impossible (Soreghan
and Giles,1999). So, it is significant to develop some effective methods
to determine ancient basin subsidence amplitudes. |
|